DK

Daryl Kimball
====================

Full Name and Common Aliases


---------------------------------

Full Name: Daryl G. Kimball
Commonly referred to as: A leading expert on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation issues.

Birth and Death Dates


-------------------------

Born: June 1967 (exact date not publicly available)
Status: Alive

Nationality and Profession(s)


----------------------------------

Nationality: American
Profession:
Executive Director of the Arms Control Association, a non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C.
Journalist and commentator on international security issues

Early Life and Background


-----------------------------

Daryl Kimball was born in June 1967. Growing up, he demonstrated an early interest in international relations and politics. This curiosity led him to pursue higher education, earning a Bachelor's degree from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). He later went on to earn his Master's degree in International Relations from the University of Maryland.

Major Accomplishments


-------------------------

Throughout his career, Kimball has made significant contributions to the field of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation. Some of his notable achievements include:

Establishing the Disarmament Diplomacy blog: In 2006, Kimball launched this influential online platform, which provides in-depth analysis on various arms control issues.
Providing expert commentary and analysis: He regularly contributes to major news outlets, such as CNN, NPR, and The New York Times, offering insightful perspectives on international security matters.
Testifying before Congress: Kimball has provided expert testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee on issues related to nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation.

Notable Works or Actions


-----------------------------

In addition to his work with the Arms Control Association, Kimball has co-authored several reports and articles on arms control topics. Some notable examples include:

"Reducing Nuclear Risks in South Asia": This report, published in 2018, examines the challenges facing nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.
"U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control Agreements": A comprehensive analysis of past agreements between the two nations.

Impact and Legacy


------------------------

Daryl Kimball's dedication to promoting disarmament and non-proliferation has had a lasting impact on international relations. His work has:

Influenced policy decisions: Kimball's expert commentary and analysis have informed policymakers, shaping their views on nuclear disarmament.
Increased public awareness: Through his blog and media appearances, he has educated the general public about the importance of arms control issues.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered


--------------------------------------------

Daryl Kimball is widely recognized for his:

In-depth knowledge: His expertise on nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation makes him a trusted source in the media and among policymakers.
Clear communication style: He effectively conveys complex issues to various audiences, from academics to general readers.
Commitment to arms control: Kimball's tireless efforts to promote disarmament and non-proliferation have earned him respect within the international community.

Quotes by Daryl Kimball

All the United States gets from a nonproliferation standpoint are a few more civilian energy production reactors under safeguards. But it's meaningless, given that India's weapons production capacity will soar in the coming years.
"
All the United States gets from a nonproliferation standpoint are a few more civilian energy production reactors under safeguards. But it's meaningless, given that India's weapons production capacity will soar in the coming years.
This is a highly complex deal and on balance it is not in the national security interests of the US. It will damage the nuclear non proliferation regime.
"
This is a highly complex deal and on balance it is not in the national security interests of the US. It will damage the nuclear non proliferation regime.
I don't think that China and Russia, at the moment, are going to support or even allow a decision to impose meaningful political or economic sanctions against Iran to go through. And that's not necessarily because Russia and China have a strong economic relationship with Iran, but because they fear, I believe, the rapid escalation of this crisis.
"
I don't think that China and Russia, at the moment, are going to support or even allow a decision to impose meaningful political or economic sanctions against Iran to go through. And that's not necessarily because Russia and China have a strong economic relationship with Iran, but because they fear, I believe, the rapid escalation of this crisis.
In Congress, this one clearly crosses party lines. The bottom line is this will not come out of Congress the way it came in.
"
In Congress, this one clearly crosses party lines. The bottom line is this will not come out of Congress the way it came in.
The negotiations for the agreement would take a substantial amount of time. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns has been telling people on the Capitol Hill (where US Congress and Senate are) that it will be a year or so.
"
The negotiations for the agreement would take a substantial amount of time. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns has been telling people on the Capitol Hill (where US Congress and Senate are) that it will be a year or so.
It's not going to come out the same way it went in.
"
It's not going to come out the same way it went in.
The next step is not clear. If the United States pushes for stronger actions against Iran, these targeted political and economic sanctions, and the Russians and the Chinese resist, then it is quite possible that the Security Council will be deadlocked. They will not be able to take any action. At the same time, that kind of scenario might lead some in the United States to argue that the Bush administration should take actions on its own. So we are moving in a very delicate phase here.
"
The next step is not clear. If the United States pushes for stronger actions against Iran, these targeted political and economic sanctions, and the Russians and the Chinese resist, then it is quite possible that the Security Council will be deadlocked. They will not be able to take any action. At the same time, that kind of scenario might lead some in the United States to argue that the Bush administration should take actions on its own. So we are moving in a very delicate phase here.
They say, 'we're within the treaty, we're within our rights'.
"
They say, 'we're within the treaty, we're within our rights'.
The bottom line is that this deal would allow India to significantly increase its nuclear weapons arsenal and provides precious little safeguarding. This is a nonproliferation nothing-burger, and Congress will see it as that if they look carefully.
"
The bottom line is that this deal would allow India to significantly increase its nuclear weapons arsenal and provides precious little safeguarding. This is a nonproliferation nothing-burger, and Congress will see it as that if they look carefully.
Even the most concerned and skeptical of intelligence agencies now estimate that Iran is nearly a decade away from developing a nuclear weapon.
"
Even the most concerned and skeptical of intelligence agencies now estimate that Iran is nearly a decade away from developing a nuclear weapon.
Showing 1 to 10 of 15 results