Full Name and Common Aliases


David Bentley Hart is a renowned American theologian, philosopher, and author.

Birth and Death Dates


Born on March 7, 1965, David Bentley Hart is still alive today.

Nationality and Profession(s)


Hart is an American citizen by birth and has worked as a theologian, philosopher, editor, and author throughout his career.

Early Life and Background

David Bentley Hart was born in 1965 in Baltimore, Maryland. Growing up in a family with strong Christian values, Hart developed a deep interest in theology and philosophy from an early age. He attended Johns Hopkins University, where he earned his Bachelor's degree in Philosophy and Theology. After completing his undergraduate studies, Hart went on to earn his Master's degree in Theology from the University of Cambridge. Later, he received his Doctorate in Theology from Fordham University.

Major Accomplishments

Hart is recognized for his extensive contributions to Christian theology, particularly in the areas of Trinitarian doctrine and the nature of God. His work has been praised for its originality, intellectual rigor, and accessibility. Some of his notable publications include:

"The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth" (2003)
"Atheist Delusions: The Christianity-Bashing of the 18th Through 21st Centuries" (2009)

Notable Works or Actions

Hart's writings often explore the intersection of theology, philosophy, and culture. His work is characterized by its intellectual depth and nuance, as well as its commitment to promoting a more nuanced understanding of Christianity in contemporary society.

Impact and Legacy

David Bentley Hart's contributions have had a significant impact on the fields of Christian theology and philosophy. His publications have been widely praised for their originality and insight, and he has been recognized as one of the leading voices in contemporary Christian thought.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered

Hart's work is often quoted and remembered due to his unique ability to combine intellectual rigor with a deep commitment to exploring the mysteries of faith. His writings have had a profound impact on many readers, who appreciate his nuanced understanding of complex theological concepts.

Throughout his career, Hart has demonstrated a remarkable capacity for original thought and intellectual curiosity. His work continues to inspire and challenge readers, ensuring that he remains one of the most widely quoted and remembered figures in contemporary Christian theology.

Quotes by David Bentley Hart

David Bentley Hart's insights on:

The most effective technique for subduing the moral imagination is to teach it to mistake the contradictory for the paradoxical, and thereby to accept incoherence as profundity, or moral idiocy as spiritual subtlety. If this can be accomplished with sufficient nuance and delicacy, it can sustain even a very powerful intellect for an entire lifetime.
"
The most effective technique for subduing the moral imagination is to teach it to mistake the contradictory for the paradoxical, and thereby to accept incoherence as profundity, or moral idiocy as spiritual subtlety. If this can be accomplished with sufficient nuance and delicacy, it can sustain even a very powerful intellect for an entire lifetime.
To believe that being is inexhaustibly intelligible is to believe also – whether one wishes to acknowledge it or not – that reality emanates from an inexhaustible intelligence: in the words of the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, “pure consciousness, omnipresent, omniscient, the creator of time.
"
To believe that being is inexhaustibly intelligible is to believe also – whether one wishes to acknowledge it or not – that reality emanates from an inexhaustible intelligence: in the words of the Shvetashvatara Upanishad, “pure consciousness, omnipresent, omniscient, the creator of time.
The soul is a story that can always be retold.
"
The soul is a story that can always be retold.
Voltaire sees only the terrible truth that the history of suffering and death is not morally intelligible. Dostoyevsky sees – and this bespeaks both his moral genius and his irreducibly Christian view of reality – that it would be far more terrible if it were.
"
Voltaire sees only the terrible truth that the history of suffering and death is not morally intelligible. Dostoyevsky sees – and this bespeaks both his moral genius and his irreducibly Christian view of reality – that it would be far more terrible if it were.
If something is worth being rude about, it is worth understanding as well.
"
If something is worth being rude about, it is worth understanding as well.
Now the Bible came to be seen as what it obviously is not: a collection of “inerrant” oracles and historical reports, each true in the same way as every other, each subject to only one level of interpretation, and all perfectly in agreement with one another.
"
Now the Bible came to be seen as what it obviously is not: a collection of “inerrant” oracles and historical reports, each true in the same way as every other, each subject to only one level of interpretation, and all perfectly in agreement with one another.
God” has become the name of some special physical force or causal principle located somewhere out there among all the other forces and principles found in the universe: not the Logos filling and forming all things, not the infinity of being and consciousness in which all things necessarily subsist, but a thing among other things, an item among all the other items encompassed within nature.
"
God” has become the name of some special physical force or causal principle located somewhere out there among all the other forces and principles found in the universe: not the Logos filling and forming all things, not the infinity of being and consciousness in which all things necessarily subsist, but a thing among other things, an item among all the other items encompassed within nature.
To bracket form and finality out of one’s investigations as far as reason allows is a matter of method, but to deny their reality altogether is a matter of metaphysics.
"
To bracket form and finality out of one’s investigations as far as reason allows is a matter of method, but to deny their reality altogether is a matter of metaphysics.
But there is something delusional nonetheless in his optimistic certainty that human beings will wish to choose altruistic values without invoking transcendent principles. They may do so; but they may also wish to build death camps, and may very well choose to do that instead. For.
"
But there is something delusional nonetheless in his optimistic certainty that human beings will wish to choose altruistic values without invoking transcendent principles. They may do so; but they may also wish to build death camps, and may very well choose to do that instead. For.
What distinguishes modernity from the age of Christendom is not that the former is more devoted to rationality than was the latter but that its rationality serves different primary commitments.
"
What distinguishes modernity from the age of Christendom is not that the former is more devoted to rationality than was the latter but that its rationality serves different primary commitments.
Showing 1 to 10 of 51 results