George M. Whitesides
George M. Whitesides: A Visionary Chemist and Educator
======================================================
#### Full Name and Common Aliases
-----------------------------
George Maniery Whitesides is commonly referred to as G.M. Whitesides.
#### Birth and Death Dates
------------------------
Born on June 23, 1939, in Louisville, Kentucky; still alive.
#### Nationality and Profession(s)
--------------------------------
American chemist, biochemist, and professor emeritus at Harvard University.
#### Early Life and Background
-----------------------------
Growing up in a family of modest means, Whitesides' early life was marked by an insatiable curiosity for the natural world. His father, who worked as a petroleum geologist, encouraged his interest in chemistry, leading to a lifelong passion for the subject. Whitesides attended Yale University, where he earned a Bachelor's degree in Chemistry in 1960 and later received his Ph.D. from California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in 1964.
#### Major Accomplishments
-------------------------
Whitesides' groundbreaking research has had far-reaching implications across various fields:
Micromachining: He pioneered the development of micromachining, a technique used to create tiny structures and devices that have revolutionized fields such as electronics, medicine, and energy.
Biomimetics: Whitesides' work on biomimetics has led to the design of novel materials and systems inspired by nature. His research in this area has resulted in breakthroughs in areas like self-healing materials and microfluidics.
#### Notable Works or Actions
------------------------------
Some notable works include:
"Microarray Fabrication: A Review" (1991): This influential paper outlined the techniques for creating microarrays, paving the way for advancements in genomics and proteomics.
Founding of the Wyss Institute: Whitesides was a founding member of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University.
Quotes by George M. Whitesides
Science has the potential to solve all kinds of problems, but it depends on what a society wants to accomplish.
Part of science is the questioning of authority, absolute freedom of ideology. The Soviets did some very good science, but when science ran into ideology, it had trouble. Science flourishes best in a democracy.
One of the issues in electronics is that we work only in two scales - transistors and collections of transistors - and that's the device. But to take full advantage of nano, we're going to have to think about that full hierarchy of levels of structure.
Because of climate changes, it's not just a question of producing energy. It's a question of producing energy in a way that we can live with in the long term. If you look at the available pieces, from conservation to nuclear, solar, whatever, and you put them all together, we can't do it.
The number of people who really work creatively on new sources of water isn't enormously large for the reason that I don't think people have very many ideas on how to get fundamentally new sources of water. We sort of think we've thought that problem through. I hope that's not true.
Capitalism is a wonderful economic engine, but it assigns little value to long-term projects or societal problems.
The virtue of binary is that it’s the simplest possible way of representing numbers. Anything else is more complicated. You can catch errors with it, it’s unambiguous in its reading, there are lots of good things about binary. So it is very, very simple once you learn how to read it.
Chemists have always been in the business of taking atoms and putting them together with other atoms with precisely defined connections.
Nanoengineering is learning how to make devices as small as 10 to 100 atoms in width. Much of the work is going on in the electronics industry, where there is great demand to pack more components onto computer chips.
Simplicity, for reasons that are a little bit obscure, is almost not pursued, at least in the academic world.