The purpose of the right to bear arms is twofold; to allow individuals to protect themselves and their families, and to ensure a body of armed citizenry from which a militia could be drawn, whether that militia’s role was to protect the nation, or to protect the people from a tyrannical government.

Democrats don’t represent the taxpayers, they represent the tax-consumers...

Let’s be honest: Kerry has no idea what it is to be even a middle-class white in this country.

But remember: All this talk of tolerance and diversity is basically just a way for one group of white people to pursue power over other groups of white people. It’s not about actually helping anyone.

If you only stand up for speech you approve of, you’re a hack. If you only stand up for speech that everyone approves of, you’re a coward.

Bush is quite vulnerable if the Democrats pick the right issues. So far, though, they’ve shown their usual tendency to go for the capillary.

It’s not so much about the cause, it’s about feeling superior to political opponents.

The proverbial thirteenth chime of the clock – is not only wrong itself, but calls into question everything that came before it.

A ‘well regulated militia’ was thus one that was well-trained and equipped, not one that was ‘well-regulated’ in the modern sense of being subjected to numerous government prohibitions and restrictions.

Hmm. Petty? Yes. Ineffectual? Yes. Infuriating and off-putting? Yes. Counterproductive? Yes. It’s got to be a product of the French Foreign Ministry.