JM

Jane Mayer

84quotes

Jane Mayer


Full Name and Common Aliases

Jane Mayer is a prominent American journalist, author, and investigative reporter known for her in-depth coverage of politics, national security, and the wealthy elite.

Birth and Death Dates

Born on September 21, 1955, in Newark, New Jersey. As of this writing, Jane Mayer is still alive.

Nationality and Profession(s)

American journalist, author, and investigative reporter.

Early Life and Background

Jane Mayer grew up in a middle-class family in Short Hills, New Jersey. Her father was an accountant, and her mother was a teacher. Mayer developed a strong interest in writing and reading at an early age, which led her to attend St. Paul's School in Concord, New Hampshire. She later earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale University in 1977.

Major Accomplishments

Jane Mayer's career spans over four decades, with numerous notable achievements:

Investigative reporting: Mayer has worked for top-tier publications such as The New Yorker, where she serves as a staff writer and investigative reporter. Her work has led to significant changes in policy and public awareness.
Book authorship: Mayer has written several critically acclaimed books, including Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right (2016) and Strange New Land: Americans in India, 1497-1620 (2008).
Awards and recognition: Mayer has received numerous awards for her work, including a National Book Award nomination for Dark Money, as well as a Gerald Loeb Award, a George Polk Award, and an Emmy Award.

Notable Works or Actions

Some of Jane Mayer's most notable works include:

"The Secret Spenders" (2012): An investigation into the role of anonymous donors in American politics.
"The Kochs' Crusade" (2008): A profile on Charles and David Koch, highlighting their influence on conservative politics.
"The Blackwater Solution" (2007): An exposé on the private security firm Blackwater's activities in Iraq.

Impact and Legacy

Jane Mayer's work has had a significant impact on public discourse, policy changes, and individual lives. Her investigations have:

Exposed hidden agendas and influence peddling among wealthy donors.
Shed light on human rights abuses and war crimes committed by private security firms.
Influenced policy debates and reforms in areas such as campaign finance, tax laws, and national security.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered

Jane Mayer is widely quoted and remembered for her:

Fearless investigative reporting, which has led to significant changes in policy and public awareness.
Ability to uncover hidden patterns of power and influence within American politics.
Commitment to holding the powerful accountable, often at great personal risk.

By exploring Jane Mayer's life and work, readers can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities of modern America and the importance of investigative journalism in shaping our world.

Quotes by Jane Mayer

Jane Mayer's insights on:

Economic inequality in the country in 2007 had reached the level of the Gilded Age in the 1890s. The gap between the top 1 percent of earners in America and everyone else had grown so wide that the top 1 percent of the population owned 35 percent of the nation’s private assets and was pocketing almost a quarter of all earnings.
"
Economic inequality in the country in 2007 had reached the level of the Gilded Age in the 1890s. The gap between the top 1 percent of earners in America and everyone else had grown so wide that the top 1 percent of the population owned 35 percent of the nation’s private assets and was pocketing almost a quarter of all earnings.
In 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency’s database revealed Koch Industries to be the number one producer of toxic waste in the country.
"
In 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency’s database revealed Koch Industries to be the number one producer of toxic waste in the country.
In contrast, for the 2016 election, the political war chest accumulated by the Kochs and their small circle of friends was projected to be $889 million, completely dwarfing the scale of money that was considered deeply corrupt during the Watergate days.
"
In contrast, for the 2016 election, the political war chest accumulated by the Kochs and their small circle of friends was projected to be $889 million, completely dwarfing the scale of money that was considered deeply corrupt during the Watergate days.
They had forced Obama to play their budget game. Instead of talking about jobs and spending, he was talking about the deficit and bargaining with them over how many trillions to cut. “We led. They reacted to us,” exulted Kevin McCarthy, the House Republican whip. The donors were excited, too. Just the fact that Obama had been thrown on the defensive convinced those whose fortunes had helped pay for the Ryan plan that their investment was worth it.
"
They had forced Obama to play their budget game. Instead of talking about jobs and spending, he was talking about the deficit and bargaining with them over how many trillions to cut. “We led. They reacted to us,” exulted Kevin McCarthy, the House Republican whip. The donors were excited, too. Just the fact that Obama had been thrown on the defensive convinced those whose fortunes had helped pay for the Ryan plan that their investment was worth it.
Theodore Roosevelt, assailed the idea, declaring, “No amount of charity in spending such fortunes can compensate in any way for the misconduct in acquiring them.
"
Theodore Roosevelt, assailed the idea, declaring, “No amount of charity in spending such fortunes can compensate in any way for the misconduct in acquiring them.
In 2013, there were over a hundred thousand private foundations in the United States with assets of over $800 billion. These peculiarly American organizations, run with little transparency or accountability to either voters or consumers yet publicly subsidized by tax breaks, have grown into 800-billion-pound Goliaths in the public policy realm.
"
In 2013, there were over a hundred thousand private foundations in the United States with assets of over $800 billion. These peculiarly American organizations, run with little transparency or accountability to either voters or consumers yet publicly subsidized by tax breaks, have grown into 800-billion-pound Goliaths in the public policy realm.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion, predicted that “with the advent of the Internet, prompt disclosure of expenditures” would be easier than ever. This, he suggested, would prevent corruption because “citizens can see whether elected officials are ‘in the pocket’ of so-called moneyed interests.
"
Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion, predicted that “with the advent of the Internet, prompt disclosure of expenditures” would be easier than ever. This, he suggested, would prevent corruption because “citizens can see whether elected officials are ‘in the pocket’ of so-called moneyed interests.
The gap between the top 1 percent of earners in America and everyone else had grown so wide by 2007 that the top 1 percent of the population owned 35 percent of the nation’s private assets and was pocketing almost a quarter of all earnings, up from just 9 percent twenty-five years earlier.
"
The gap between the top 1 percent of earners in America and everyone else had grown so wide by 2007 that the top 1 percent of the population owned 35 percent of the nation’s private assets and was pocketing almost a quarter of all earnings, up from just 9 percent twenty-five years earlier.
Opponents of climate change reform got their wish. “Gridlock is the greatest friend a global warming skeptic has, because that’s all you really want,” Morano later acknowledged. “There’s no legislation we’re championing. We’re the negative force. We are just trying to stop stuff.
"
Opponents of climate change reform got their wish. “Gridlock is the greatest friend a global warming skeptic has, because that’s all you really want,” Morano later acknowledged. “There’s no legislation we’re championing. We’re the negative force. We are just trying to stop stuff.
Well, yes, I mean, I think that, you know, my sources suggest that there’s a lot of support for the notion that there is a lot of Koran abuse and that it was very much a systematic design, not just an aberration.
"
Well, yes, I mean, I think that, you know, my sources suggest that there’s a lot of support for the notion that there is a lot of Koran abuse and that it was very much a systematic design, not just an aberration.
Showing 1 to 10 of 84 results