John Rawls
John Rawls
================
Full Name and Common Aliases
--------------------------------
John Rawls was born on February 21, 1921, in Baltimore, Maryland. His full name was John Bordley Rawls.
Birth and Death Dates
-------------------------
Born: February 21, 1921
Died: November 24, 2002
Nationality and Profession(s)
--------------------------------
John Rawls was an American philosopher who primarily focused on ethics and political philosophy. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential philosophers of his time.
Early Life and Background
-----------------------------
Rawls grew up in a family with strong ties to education. His mother, Anne Leland, was a schoolteacher, while his father, John Bardley Rawls, was an insurance company executive. The young Rawls showed exceptional academic talent from the beginning. He attended Phillips Exeter Academy before pursuing higher education at Princeton University.
At Princeton, Rawls was exposed to various philosophical ideas and thinkers. He developed a particular interest in ethics and justice, which would become central themes throughout his career. After graduating with honors in 1943, Rawls joined the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II. During this period, he continued to study philosophy.
Upon returning from the war, Rawls went on to attend Cornell University, where he earned his Ph.D. in Philosophy in 1950. He then held positions at several institutions, including Harvard University and the City College of New York.
Major Accomplishments
-------------------------
Rawls's most significant contribution is arguably his theory of justice as fairness, which was presented in his influential book A Theory of Justice (1971). In this work, Rawls introduced two main principles: the liberty principle and the difference principle. He argued that a just society should prioritize individual liberties while ensuring economic equality.
Notable Works or Actions
-----------------------------
Some notable works by John Rawls include:
A Theory of Justice (1971) - This book is considered one of his most significant contributions to philosophy.
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (2001) - This work provides a restatement and expansion of his original theory.
Collected Papers (1999) - This collection includes various essays, lectures, and other works written by Rawls.Impact and Legacy
----------------------
Rawls's impact on contemporary philosophy is profound. His ideas about justice as fairness have been influential in shaping discussions around social contract theory, distributive justice, and human rights. His work has also had a significant impact on fields such as economics, politics, and sociology.
His influence can be seen in the work of numerous scholars and thinkers who have built upon or critiqued his ideas. Rawls's legacy extends beyond academia; his concepts have been applied in various real-world contexts, including policy-making and social activism.
Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
--------------------------------------------
John Rawls is widely quoted and remembered for several reasons:
His groundbreaking theory of justice as fairness has had a lasting impact on the field of philosophy.
His work continues to influence contemporary debates around issues such as economic inequality, social justice, and human rights.
His commitment to promoting a fairer society through philosophical inquiry has left a lasting legacy.
Overall, John Rawls was a dedicated scholar who made significant contributions to the field of philosophy. His ideas about justice continue to shape ongoing discussions around the world.
Quotes by John Rawls
John Rawls's insights on:

The refusal to take part in all war under any conditions is an unworldly view bound to remain a sectarian doctrine. It no more challenges the state’s authority than the celibacy of priests challenges the sanctity of marriage.

When the basic structure of society is publicly known to satisfy its principles for an extended period of time, those subject to these arrangements tend to develop a desire to act in accordance with these principles and to do their part in institutions which exemplify them.

Among the essential features of this situation is that no one knows his place in society, his class position or social status, nor does any one know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength, and the like. I shall even assume that the parties do not know their conceptions of the good or their special psychological propensities. The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance.

The hazards of the generalized prisoner’s dilemma are removed by the match between the right and the good.

While the distribution of wealth and income need not be equal, it must be to everyone’s advantage, and at the same time, positions of authority and offices of command must be accessible to all.

When parties and elections are financed not by public funds but by private contributions, the political forum is so constrained by the wishes of the dominant interests that the basic measures needed to establish just constitutional rule are seldom properly presented.

The other limitation on our discussion is that for the most part I examine the principles of justice that would regulate a well-ordered society. Everyone is presumed to act justly and to do his part in upholding just institutions.

There is no reason to suppose ahead of time that the principles satisfactory for the basic structure hold for all cases.

