I don't know if my question had a premise.

Internet Explorer is not a stand-alone browser because the relevant integration occurred at the design stage. Internet Explorer is an integral feature (of Windows '95), like a shutter in a camera or a transmission in a car.

They can't put them in as the cross examination of Mr. Fade, because he isn't here, ... They rested their case. They're not entitled to more documents.

It means I would give good value to the buyer.

Your real objection is that they put the browser in the operating system -- you want it out, right?

Do you have any disagreements with Case's statement?

Isn't it true that any home user who wants to use Netscape's browsing software has the choice to do so at no cost?

Isn't it true that Netscape has actually increased the pace of new releases of its browser software as a result of Microsoft's browser software?

Isn't it true that the most important factor for AOL in choosing Internet Explorer was getting software that worked well with AOL's client software?

Isn't it true that there's nothing in AOL's contract with Microsoft that limits its ability to give its customers Navigator?