JY

John Yoo

50quotes

John Yoo


A renowned American lawyer, law professor, and author, John Choon Yoo is a prominent figure in the fields of national security law, constitutional law, and international human rights law.

Full Name and Common Aliases


Full Name: John Choon Yoo
Common Aliases: None notable

Birth and Death Dates


Born: 5 July 1967, San Francisco, California, USA
Deceased: N/A (still alive)

Nationality and Profession(s)


Nationality: American
Profession(s):
Lawyer
Law Professor
* Author

Early Life and Background


John Yoo was born to a Korean-American family in San Francisco. He grew up in the Bay Area, where he developed an interest in politics and law at an early age. After graduating from high school, Yoo attended Harvard University, where he earned his Bachelor's degree in economics in 1988. He later went on to earn his Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from Yale Law School in 1991.

Major Accomplishments


John Yoo is best known for his work as a lawyer and law professor. He has served as the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley's Boalt Hall School of Law since 2003. Prior to this appointment, he worked in private practice, first at Latham & Watkins and later at Kirkland & Ellis.

Notable Works or Actions


One of Yoo's most significant contributions is his Memorandum Opinion for the President (2001), where he argued that the president had the authority to use enhanced interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects. This opinion was widely criticized by human rights groups and others, who saw it as an attempt to justify torture.

In addition to this, Yoo has written extensively on national security law, international law, and constitutional law. He is also a prolific author, having published numerous articles, book reviews, and book chapters in academic journals and publications.

Impact and Legacy


John Yoo's work has been both praised and criticized by various groups. While some see him as an expert in his field, others have accused him of contributing to the erosion of civil liberties and human rights. His opinions on enhanced interrogation techniques have sparked intense debate, with some arguing that they were instrumental in shaping US policy.

Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered


John Yoo is widely quoted and remembered due to his significant contributions to national security law and international human rights law. As a prominent figure in the fields of constitutional law and international law, he continues to be sought out as an expert by media outlets, think tanks, and government agencies.

His opinions on enhanced interrogation techniques, although criticized by many, have had a lasting impact on US policy and continue to shape public debate on national security and human rights. As such, Yoo remains a key figure in the ongoing conversation about the balance between national security and individual liberties.

Quotes by John Yoo

John Yoo's insights on:

It has never demonstrated any desire to provide humane treatment to captured Americans. If anything, the murders of Nicholas Berg and Daniel Pearl declare al Qaeda’s intentions to kill even innocent civilian prisoners.
"
It has never demonstrated any desire to provide humane treatment to captured Americans. If anything, the murders of Nicholas Berg and Daniel Pearl declare al Qaeda’s intentions to kill even innocent civilian prisoners.
Personally, I do not think that torture is necessary. But it may be the case that interrogation methods that go beyond questioning, but do not arise to the level of torture, may be necessary to get actionable intelligence from high-ranking al Qaeda leaders.
"
Personally, I do not think that torture is necessary. But it may be the case that interrogation methods that go beyond questioning, but do not arise to the level of torture, may be necessary to get actionable intelligence from high-ranking al Qaeda leaders.
Human-rights advocates, for example, claim that the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners is of a piece with President Bush’s 2002 decision to deny al Qaeda and Taliban fighters the legal status of prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions.
"
Human-rights advocates, for example, claim that the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners is of a piece with President Bush’s 2002 decision to deny al Qaeda and Taliban fighters the legal status of prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions.
There was nothing wrong – and everything right – with analyzing a law that establishes boundaries on interrogation in the war on terrorism.
"
There was nothing wrong – and everything right – with analyzing a law that establishes boundaries on interrogation in the war on terrorism.
The United States has used force abroad more than 130 times, but has only declared war five times – the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, and World Wars I and II.
"
The United States has used force abroad more than 130 times, but has only declared war five times – the War of 1812, the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, and World Wars I and II.
Congress’s definition of torture in those laws – the infliction of severe mental or physical pain – leaves room for interrogation methods that go beyond polite conversation.
"
Congress’s definition of torture in those laws – the infliction of severe mental or physical pain – leaves room for interrogation methods that go beyond polite conversation.
The Justices are currently considering a case, argued last month, which seeks to extend the writ of habeas corpus to al Qaeda and Taliban detainees at Guantanamo.
"
The Justices are currently considering a case, argued last month, which seeks to extend the writ of habeas corpus to al Qaeda and Taliban detainees at Guantanamo.
Al Qaeda operates by launching surprise attacks on civilian targets with the goal of massive casualties. Our only means for preventing future attacks, which could use WMDs, is by acquiring information that allows for pre-emptive action.
"
Al Qaeda operates by launching surprise attacks on civilian targets with the goal of massive casualties. Our only means for preventing future attacks, which could use WMDs, is by acquiring information that allows for pre-emptive action.
This is not to condone torture, which is still prohibited by the Torture Convention and federal criminal law.
"
This is not to condone torture, which is still prohibited by the Torture Convention and federal criminal law.
We can guess that the unacceptable conduct of the soldiers at Abu Ghraib resulted in part from the dangerous state of affairs on the ground in a theater of war.
"
We can guess that the unacceptable conduct of the soldiers at Abu Ghraib resulted in part from the dangerous state of affairs on the ground in a theater of war.
Showing 1 to 10 of 50 results