Sam Zarifi
Sam Zarifi: A Life of Activism and Advocacy
==========================
Full Name and Common Aliases
Sam Zarifi is a well-known American journalist, author, and human rights activist. He is also known by his alias "Sayed Abid".
Birth and Death Dates
Not available.
Nationality and Profession(s)
Nationality: American
Profession: Journalist, Author, Human Rights Activist
Early Life and Background
Sam Zarifi was born in the United States. His early life is not well-documented; however, his extensive work in human rights advocacy suggests a strong commitment to social justice from an early age.
Major Accomplishments
Throughout his career, Sam Zarifi has achieved numerous significant accomplishments:
He worked as a senior investigative editor at Amnesty International from 2004-2009.
As the Asia-Pacific regional director of the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), he coordinated advocacy efforts for journalists and freedom of expression worldwide.
In 2011, Zarifi became the Amnesty International's Senior Director for Crisis Response.Notable Works or Actions
Some notable works and actions attributed to Sam Zarifi include:
His extensive work on documenting human rights abuses in various regions.
* He authored several reports on human rights issues around the world.
Impact and Legacy
Sam Zarifi has had a profound impact on human rights advocacy worldwide. His dedication to exposing injustices and promoting accountability for governments and other powerful entities has inspired countless others to follow in his footsteps.
Why They Are Widely Quoted or Remembered
As a renowned journalist and activist, Sam Zarifi is widely recognized for his unwavering commitment to social justice. His contributions to the field of human rights advocacy have made him a respected figure within the global community.
This bio serves as a testament to the life's work and legacy of Sam Zarifi, highlighting his many accomplishments and their lasting impact on the world.
Quotes by Sam Zarifi
The London Conference should not be an occasion for celebratory backslapping, but for rolling up sleeves and making up for past weak performance. The gains made by Afghans are not sustainable without greater international support and commitment.
The Maoists can voice their opposition to these elections, but that does not mean they are free to kill those who choose to participate.
The US detain people, keep them for a while and then release them without charges. It sometimes take two months for the family to know where the detainees are.
The young people had been used as cooks, porters and medical personnel, but they had had military training and all were carrying grenades and socket bombs when they were picked up.
This election could have produced a parliament that really reflected the wants and needs of the Afghan people to be free from the rule of the gun . . . and for clinics, roads, schools and jobs. Instead what we may get is a parliament stocked with figures who represent the bloody past and who have very little legitimacy or competence to address the basic needs of the country.
The success of the Conference should be judged by how much donors commit to do for the security and development of the Afghan people, not their own political agendas. The real measure of security and development in Afghanistan is not the number of foreign troops, but whether people feel safe enough to go to the market, to travel at night to seek medical care, or to send their children to school.
These events give the lie to the king's repeated statements about his firm belief in democracy. If he wants his public commitments to fundamental liberties to be taken seriously, he has to show that his forces will respect basic human rights standards.
The vigilantes operate completely outside the law, and this situation places civilians more deeply in the path of danger.
Both the king and the Maoists must step back from the brink before Nepal sinks deeper into disaster.