The judge was probably using the term evidence loosely, because we haven't heard the first word from the first witness yet.

He continues to issue press releases claiming that the court has already ruled that Mr. Noe committed a fraud. That's false.

There is an avalanche of evidence that will show that Noe's association with the coin fund was widely known, and making the assertion of concealment is preposterous.

Mr. Noe has not admitted any wrongdoing of any kind in connection with the coin fund or anything else in his life.

We are talking about assets that in some cases were purchased a decade before the fund existed. If the attorney general could prove those assets were purchased with coin-fund assets, it would be a miracle in the courtroom.