#Literary Criticism
Quotes about literary-criticism
Literary criticism is the art of evaluating and interpreting the deeper meanings and nuances within literary works. It serves as a bridge between the reader and the text, offering insights that enhance understanding and appreciation. This discipline delves into the themes, structures, and contexts of literature, unraveling the layers of meaning that authors weave into their narratives. People are drawn to quotes about literary criticism because they encapsulate the essence of this intellectual pursuit, often providing a fresh perspective or a thought-provoking angle on a beloved work. These quotes can inspire readers to look beyond the surface, encouraging them to engage with literature in a more profound and reflective manner. By exploring the critical interpretations of others, individuals can discover new dimensions of their favorite stories, fostering a deeper connection with the text and its broader cultural significance. Whether you're a seasoned scholar or a curious reader, the world of literary criticism offers a rich tapestry of ideas and interpretations that can transform the way you experience literature.
Each work of criticism is supposed to build on the body of work, to increase the total sum of human understanding. It's not like filling your house with more and more beautiful wicker baskets. It's supposed to be cumulative - it believes in progress.
[T]he new weird represents a productive experiment in fantasy fiction. The New Wave of the 1960s and 1970s arguably embodied science fiction's claim to literary 'seriousness.' This desire for seriousness is not snobbery, as sometimes suggested by folks who overemphasize the entertainment function of speculative fiction; it's about recognition of the vast possibilities within the field.
If you tell me bad things about someone, you're telling bad things about me behind me
It may be true that we all have a novel inside of us. Better in than out in the present case. Burning Ashes appears to have been typed rather than written. If so, it was a great deal easier to type than it is to read. Its tone is vulgar; it lacks invention. It is designed to thrill the repressed and soothe the subliterate, and no doubt they will be thrilled and soothed. Nature, I fear, did not intend Ms Lewis-Foster to write.
The critic's aim should be to interpret the work they are writing about and help readers appreciate it, by defining and analysing those qualities that make it precious and by indicating the angle of visions from which its beauties are visible. But many critics do not realize their function. They aim not to appreciate, but to judge; they seek first to draw lines about literature and then bully readers into accepting these laws.
No, I wasn't trying to make Nat Turner look stupid. I was trying to make him more human. More like me. Angry, impotent, confused about his own sexuality. Wait a minute, that didn't come out right. Is that microphone really on?
If the relation of morality to art were based simply on the demand that art be concerned with values, then almost every author should satisfy it even if he wrote with his prick while asleep. (Puritans will object to the language in that sentence, and feminists to the organ, and neither will admire or even notice how it was phrased.)
The critic will certainly be an interpreter, but he will not treat Art as a riddling Sphinx, whose shallow secret may be guessed and revealed by one whose feet are wounded and who knows not his name. Rather, he will look upon Art as a goddess whose mystery it is his province to intensify, and whose majesty his privilege to make more marvellous in the eyes of men.
