#Macroevolution
Quotes about macroevolution
Macroevolution is a captivating and expansive concept that delves into the grand tapestry of life's history on Earth. It represents the large-scale evolutionary changes that occur over extended periods, leading to the emergence of new species, genera, families, and even entire ecosystems. Unlike microevolution, which focuses on small, incremental changes within a species, macroevolution explores the profound transformations that shape the diversity of life across millennia. People are drawn to quotes about macroevolution because they encapsulate the awe-inspiring journey of life, from the simplest organisms to the complex web of biodiversity we see today. These quotes often evoke a sense of wonder and curiosity, inviting us to ponder the intricate processes that have sculpted the natural world. They remind us of the interconnectedness of all living things and the dynamic nature of life itself. Whether you're a science enthusiast, a nature lover, or simply someone fascinated by the mysteries of existence, quotes about macroevolution offer a glimpse into the profound and ongoing story of life on our planet.
Although random mutations influenced the course of evolution, their influence was mainly by loss, alteration, and refinement... Never, however, did that one mutation make a wing, a fruit, a woody stem, or a claw appear. Mutations, in summary, tend to induce sickness, death, or deficiencies. No evidence in the vast literature of heredity changes shows unambiguous evidence that random mutation itself, even with geographical isolation of populations, leads to speciation.
In China we can criticize Darwin, but not the government; in America, you can criticize the government, but not Darwin!
Natural selection eliminates and maybe maintains, but it doesn't create... Neo-Darwinists say that new species emerge when mutations occur and modify an organism. I was taught over and over again that the accumulation of random mutations led to evolutionary change [which] led to new species. I believed it until I looked for evidence.
But then with me the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man's mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey's mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?[To William Graham 3 July 1881]
I believe the defenders of intelligent design deserve our gratitude for challenging a scientific world view that owes some of the passion displayed by its adherents precisely to the fact that it is thought to liberate us from religion. That world view is ripe for displacement....
If theft is advantageous to everyone who succeeds at it, and adultery is a good strategy, at least for males, for increasing presence in the gene pool, why do we feel they are wrong? Shouldn't the only morality that evolution produces be the kind Bill Clinton had - being sorry you got caught?
But then arises the doubt, can the mind of man, which has, as I fully believe been developed from a mind as low as that possessed by the lowest animal, be trusted when it draws such grand conclusions?
Darwinism by itself did not produce the Holocaust, but without Darwinism... neither Hitler nor his Nazi followers would have had the necessary scientific underpinnings to convince themselves and their collaborators that one of the worlds greatest atrocities was really morally praiseworthy.
All disciplines of science are built on the causality of the relationships governing related events. Yet the theory of evolution is built upon the idea of accidental changes that resulted in complex living systems. I was unable to comprehend how the notion that an infinite number of random accidents systematically happened to produce living species, and kept improving these beings, is justified.