#Nuclear Weapons
Quotes about nuclear-weapons
Nuclear weapons, a formidable symbol of both power and peril, have shaped global politics and human consciousness since their inception. Representing the zenith of technological advancement and the nadir of potential destruction, these weapons evoke a complex tapestry of emotions and ethical considerations. The topic of nuclear weapons is not just about the physical devices themselves, but also about the profound implications they hold for humanity's future. People are drawn to quotes about nuclear weapons because they encapsulate the tension between fear and hope, destruction and peace, and the moral dilemmas that accompany such immense power. These quotes often serve as poignant reminders of the delicate balance between safeguarding security and ensuring survival. They provoke thought, inspire dialogue, and challenge us to reflect on the responsibilities that come with wielding such power. In a world where the threat of nuclear conflict looms, these reflections are more relevant than ever, urging us to consider the paths we choose and the legacies we leave behind.
Hillary Clinton's policies unleashed ISIS, spread terrorism and put Iran on a path to nuclear weapons.
Israel has military capabilities including nuclear weapons, far surpassing any other power in the Middle East, but it's a small country. The rest of the Middle Eastern peoples are Muslim and Israelis are not, so it is hardly in any position to become the leading power.
Iran - the world's leading sponsor of terrorism - is close to having nuclear weapons.
You know, there was a time at the beginning of the 50's when this nuclear threat hung over the world, but the attitude of the West was like granite and the West did not yield. Today, this nuclear threat still hangs on both sides, but the West has chosen the wrong path of making concessions.
When the world is to come to it's final destruction the powerful will always reason of peaceful nuclear programs which in my own words is a shameful chapter to start when the world has already been destroyed.
The New START accord cuts the strategic nuclear arsenals on each side to 1,550 warheads. Can any of its critics make a case that our security would be imperiled if, the very next day, Obama and Medvedev made moves to take the levels down to 1,000—then to 500?If so, come show us the math. If not, it may be time to stop making arms control so politically complicated—time to stop letting arms control get in the way of disarmament.
Unfortunately, however, weapons of mass destruction tend to attract maniacs: men - it's almost always men - who want to jab the red button and yell "Take that, you heathen infidel bastards!" and sit in their revolving chairs in underground lead-lined bunkers or caves, watching on their monitors World War III or the Final Jihad or whatever.